NPP raises concerns over NDC’s shifting position on Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill

The Member of Parliament for Assin South, Rev. John Ntim Fordjour, has expressed concerns over what he describes as inconsistencies in the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) and President John Dramani Mahama’s handling of the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.

Speaking at a press conference at the New Patriotic Party (NPP) headquarters in Asylum Down on Tuesday, Rev. Fordjour suggested that the NDC’s approach to the controversial legislation appears to have evolved since the party assumed office.

“We have invited you to address a matter of national importance—one that raises questions about consistency and clarity in the handling of a sensitive national issue,” he told journalists.

Rev. Fordjour, who identified himself as a sponsor of the 2021 private member’s bill, recalled that the legislation previously enjoyed support from lawmakers across the political divide, including members of the NDC.

He noted that at the time, the bill was widely framed as reflecting the cultural and religious values of many Ghanaians.

According to him, the NDC’s stance while in opposition was both strong and visible, with the party actively engaging various stakeholders and criticizing the then-government’s approach to the matter.

He further indicated that during the 2024 election campaign, former President Mahama made public commitments regarding the bill, emphasizing Ghana’s sovereignty in determining its laws.

However, Rev. Fordjour observed that the tone of engagement appears to have shifted since the NDC returned to power in 2025.

He cited remarks attributed to President Mahama suggesting that, following the expiration of the previous Parliament, a new government-sponsored bill—developed through broader stakeholder consultation—might be more appropriate than the earlier private member’s initiative.

Rev. Fordjour described this as a transition from a more assertive advocacy approach to a more consultative and measured one, possibly influenced by legal, constitutional, and international considerations.

Despite subsequent indications that the President could assent to the bill if duly passed, the MP suggested that the urgency previously associated with the legislation appears to have reduced.

He referenced comments attributed to President Mahama on March 31, 2026, indicating that the administration is currently prioritizing other pressing national needs, with the bill not seen as an immediate priority.

Rev. Fordjour questioned whether this shift aligns with the earlier emphasis placed on the issue, calling for greater clarity on the government’s current position.

He also raised concerns about perceived differences in messaging to domestic and international audiences, suggesting the need for a more consistent and transparent communication approach.

On the education front, the MP pointed to earlier statements by the President highlighting the importance of curriculum in promoting societal values.

He, however, referenced a recent issue involving the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NaCCA), where certain content in a teacher’s manual was later described as an anomaly.

Rev. Fordjour urged authorities to ensure that educational materials remain aligned with agreed national values and standards.

Additionally, he noted that some public figures who had previously been vocal on the bill have been less prominent in recent discussions, calling for renewed engagement on the issue.

The Assin South MP emphasized the need for clear communication from the Presidency regarding its intentions if the bill is reintroduced and passed by Parliament.

“Clarity on this matter will help guide public understanding and ensure transparency in the legislative process,” he said.

He also encouraged continued dialogue among stakeholders, including religious bodies, civil society groups, and lawmakers, as the national conversation on the bill evolves.

Rev. Fordjour reaffirmed the NPP’s commitment to holding the government accountable while advocating for what he described as the broader interests and values of the Ghanaian people.

Story by: Joshua Kwabena Smith